FIIs are increasingly issuing new allocations for real estate purchases, and the opportunity is open for you.
Real estate funds are now using quotas instead of cash to purchase assets like buildings, malls, and sheds, creating new quotas for the property owner.
Such businesses transferred at least R$ 3 billion in 2026.
For the investor, this strategy results in an immediate reduction in their share of the FII, similar to what occurs when a company introduces new shares.
Also make sure to read
- Business Fund TRXF11 decides against purchasing a real estate portfolio worth R $2 billion from Cyrela.
The property seller receives all the new quotas, leading to a decrease in each investor’s share as the number of quotas increases. Investors must purchase more quotas to benefit from this difference.
Dilution in a thesis can be compensated in the future by the arrival of new rental contracts for real estate purchased by FIIs, which increases the monthly distribution.
The investor can gain or lose depending on how much the cake grows, as they receive a smaller portion of a bigger cake.
A significant dilution can lower the quota price substantially, potentially resulting in losses for investors if the price does not rebound.
The TRXF11 fund experienced a significant drop of 20% within a two-week period in early August and has not bounced back since.
The fund announced on 7 August that it would issue quotas worth R$ 5 billion, with the potential to increase to R$ 10 billion.
The brick fund made its biggest offer ever, investing in physical properties. The transaction is currently in progress and is expected to be finalized by November.
Investors believe that issuing new shares will significantly dilute the existing asset holders in the portfolio as the Real Estate Investment Fund (FII) can nearly triple the number of shares available.
If the proposal is for R$ 5 billion, the number of quotas would increase from 62 million to 115 million. If the amount raised reaches the maximum of R$ 10 billion, the base would rise to 168 million.
Some of the quotas will serve as currency for buying assets such as shares in five Iguatemi shopping centers, three warehouses in Guarulhos, the Emiliano Hotel in Rio de Janeiro, and other properties.
TRXF11 has the potential to become the biggest Real Estate Investment Fund (FII) in the market, exceeding R$ 15 billion in value, but at a steep cost.
In July, prior to the announcement, the dividend decreased to R$0.93 per share from the previous distribution of R$1.50. This lower payment was also made in August and September.
Analysts believe that rapid growth might be leading to a decrease in income equality, which is a common outcome of significant expansion. Despite TRX CEO Luiz Amaral stating that growth is not pursued at any expense, the market remains cautious.
If everything goes according to plan, the coach has the potential to emerge victorious.
There is a positive aspect to the situation. Buying with installments could also provide a chance to buy more items at a discounted price in the future.
Dilution decreases the value of the quota, but at the same time, the estate’s value increased due to the acquisition of more real estate.
When the total value of all shares is lower than the actual value of the real estate held by the FII, it indicates that the fund is being traded at a discount. Over time, it is typical for this gap to narrow, resulting in an increase in the value of the shares.
The exchange for shares is a cost-effective method for fund managers to add a new property to their portfolio while maintaining liquidity. When executed correctly, this operation can also enhance the value of the shares.
When the properties are fully incorporated into the FII payment process, the market may perceive the investment as having a more stable foundation.
Here are some recent examples of transactions involving quotas.
| Fund Buyer | Value involved | Business |
| FATN11 | R$ 380 million | Relief of 15 properties from the TRXF11 portfolio to the BRC Urban Income (FATN11), with structured payment via emission/delivery of quotas from the buyer fund. |
| TRXF11 | R$ 800 million | Retail properties located in Assaí, combining money and quota emission from TRXF11. |
| GGRC11 | R$ 299 million | Acquisition of the SNLG11 portfolio and assets of the VTLT11 with liquidation mostly via emission of new GGRC11 quotas. |
| PMLL11 | R$ 286 million | Purchase of slices in five VISC11 malls (as Granja Vianna and Black Bridge), pays entirely in PMLL11 quotas. |
| RBVA11 | R$ 330 million | Incorporation of the RBED11 portfolio by RBVA11 with emission and delivery of quotas to Heritage Value. Rio Bravo reported that the operation obeyed the safeguards determined by the CVM: it elaborated evaluation report, besides submitting and approving the operation in a meeting of shareholders, with qualified quorum |
| TEPP11 | R$ 138 million | Purchase of the building South Tower (SP), combining box and delivery of new TEPP11 quotas integrated by sellers. |
Where can you make a mistake?
The main issue in the story is the potential disappointment if the new property does not meet expectations. For instance, with corporate buildings, there is a risk of acquiring a property with high vacancies that may remain unoccupied for years.
If the new funds do not make up for the rise in the number of shares, the dilution issue remains unresolved. Despite the overall growth, each individual’s share may be smaller due to more participants benefiting from it.
Also read
- FII investors should be cautious about renegotiations in high CRI investments.
A more intricate risk is the potential conflict of interests that arises when FIIs charge a management fee that is tied to the fund’s assets.
Introducing additional quotas boosts this legacy and, in turn, the manager’s earnings. However, there is a risk involved: purchases made to inflate the fund’s size without consulting investors.
A manager, speaking anonymously to InvestNews, highlighted a different issue. When a property seller receives new quotas in such transactions, there is typically a restriction preventing immediate resale on the market. This limitation is intended to avoid sudden selling that could adversely affect the FII valuation.
When the deadline expires, the previous property owner who transferred to the Real Estate Investment Fund (FII) can freely enter the market and sell a significant amount of shares, causing the price to drop.
Why does the salesperson make physical contact?
When someone sells a property, they are required to pay income tax on the profit earned from the sale.
Recipients of quotas pay the tax only when they sell the papers, which might not happen for years. The tax remains but is deferred.
The seller typically agrees to a lock-up period during which they are unable to sell their shares. During this time, they hope for an increase in share prices to generate additional profits above the agreed-upon price for the property.
CVM demands increased transparency.
The Securities Commission (CVM) introduced a set of regulations in early September to regulate such acquisitions and oversee their growth.
The CVM required an impartial appraiser to assess the property and for the shareholders’ assembly to authorize the transaction as outlined in the fund’s regulations.
The quota matter must adhere to the report’s value, with the FII not allowed to purchase the property for more than the amount indicated by the independent evaluation.
Also make sure to read
- Logistics real estate investment funds are now feeling the impact of the retail crisis, with some being hit harder than others.
Fabio Carvalho, the Alianza manager’s partner, believes that the CVM’s participation in the game will enhance operations by addressing payment transaction concerns and ensuring clarity for future compliance.